Minter-Weisman Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
The Commissioner of Revenue concluded that relator Minter-Weisman Company violated Minn.Stat. § 325D.33, subd. 3 (1992), by giving rebates to cigarette retailers. Minter-Weisman argues that (1) the Commissioner misconstrued section 325D.33, subdivision 3, by applying it to above cost sales; (2) the statute as applied unlawfully restrains trade; (3) the statute impairs Minter-Weis-man’s right to contract; (4) the statute is unconstitutionally vague; and (5) the Commissioner violated the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act by changing its interpretation of the statute.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Elbow Lake Cooperative Grain Company, a Minnesota Cooperative Association v. Commodity Credit Corporation, a Corporation Created by Act of CongressCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Huber v. Niagara MacH. and Tool WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Twin City Candy and Tobacco Co. v. A. Weisman Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weber v. HvassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Kangas v. Industrial Welders & Machinists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019