Legal Opinion
Womeldorf v. Steinbergen
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1832PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Assumpsit. In this case, a jury was struck, under the statute, and sixteen persons were returned upon the panel. Twelve of these were called into the box.
1Opinion of the CourtCollett, J.
was of opinion that the challenge could not be received.
WRIGHT, J. was in favor of admitting it. Owing to this division of opinion, the challenge was not received, and the juror was sworn. •
A verdict was taken for the plaintiff for $227.36.
Judges HITCHCOCK and WRIGHT were of opinion the challenge was admissible. Judges COLLETT and LANE were of opinion it was inadmissible.
Owing to this division, the motion for a new trial failed, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the verdict.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Knapp v. HartungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Royse v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880