de Rham v. Diamond
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
The State Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, acting pursuant to section 21 (suhd. [b]) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, determined that there is “ reasonable assurance ” that construction and operation of Consolidated Edison’s Cornwall Project will not violate or contravene water quality standards applicable to the waters of the Hudson River. On this appeal, the scope of judicial review being limited, we are called upon, not to weigh the facts or merits of this long-drawn-out -controversy de novo, hut simply to decide whether the Commissioner acted in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- deRham v. DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by19 opinions
- Town of Springfield v. Vermont Environmental BoardDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1981
- Power Authority v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hudson River Fishermen's Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Power Authority v. Department of Environmental ConservationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.