Legal Opinion

Petrushansky v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated March 10, 1983, as denied its motion for summary judgment. 11 Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. U We reject defendant’s contention that the continuous treatment doctrine may not toll the Statute of Limitations after service of a notice of claim, when the treatments continue past the time of the service. The patient must serve a notice of claim to preserve a potential lawsuit since said notice is a condition precedent to suit (Giblin v Nassau…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Giblin v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Barrella v. Richmond Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Ganess v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Reyes v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API