Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1996No. 73,552PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is the State’s appeal from the district court’s dismissal of all criminal charges at the conclusion of the preliminary hearing based on the State’s failure to meet its burden of proof that a crime had been committed. The State appeals pursuant to K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 22-3602(b)(1).

The defendant, W. Fletcher Bell, was charged with two counts of theft by deception (K.S.A. 21-3701[b]) arising out of a workers compensation claim. To convict a defendant of theft by deception^ the State is required to prove a number of elements (K.S.A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. Mortimer v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. BockertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. StephensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API