Legal Opinion
Tabor v. O'Dell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 16, 1948No. 4-8440PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gtrieein Smith, Chief Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment that petitions filed with the County Court .were sufficient to require an election under Initiated ’ Act No. 1 of 1942-3. The measure deals with intoxicating liquors.
Appellants think that because Act 74 of 1883 divided the County into two districts for Circuit, Chancery, and Probate Court purposes, it must have been in legislative contemplation that County Court — in respect of subject ‘matter — would not have jurisdiction if rights enjoyed by citizens of one district would be prejudiced by action of citizens of the other district.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Belford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Denniston, County Judge v. RiddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Mondier v. MedlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Scaramuzza v. McLeod, Comm'r of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carter v. ReameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Bates v. MiklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.