Legal Opinion

Charles E. Saunooke and Carol M. Saunooke v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 5, 1986No. Appeal 86-1069PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case is a sequel to Critzer v. United States, 597 F.2d 708, 220 Ct.Cl. 43 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 920, 100 S.Ct. 239, 62 L.Ed.2d 176 (1979). There the Court of Claims held that income received by an Indian from businesses she operated on tax-exempt land and from leases of buildings upon such land was not exempt from federal income taxes. In the present case, members of the same tribe of Indians that was involved in Critzer seek a federal income tax exemption for the portion of the same kind of income involved in Critzer that reflects the rental value…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Critzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Charles E. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Katz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Rickard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Fatt v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API