Legal Opinion

Thomas R. v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 1984No. 0106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Both appellants, South Carolina Department of Social Services and Mr. and Mrs. Wardlaw, are appealing a Family Court order allowing the respondents (Mr. and Mrs. Morgan) to adopt the minor, Krystie Owens. We affirm.

In an equity action tried by a judge without a reference the Supreme Court (also Appeals Court) has jurisdiction to find facts in accordance with its view of the preponderance of the evidence. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773 (1976).

The primary issue is whether the Department of Social Services (DSS) holding temporary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Galloway v. GallowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Martin v. EllisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Stephens v. RinglingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  5. Ex Parte TillmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smalls v. WeedCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Mann v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Phillips v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Gardner v. Baby EdwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API