Legal Opinion

McCann v. Consolidated Traction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to Essex Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendant in error, the defendant below, operates an electric street car line of railway in the city of Newark. On the line of its street railway and on the tracks thereof the defendant company, at times, for the purpose of allaying dust, operates a water sprinkler. This car or tank is propelled by electricity and operated and managed *483by a inotorman and one or two other employes of the defendant. It is a car upon which a large tank of water is placed.

On August 11th, 1895, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walton v. New York Central Sleeping Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Howe v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Phelon v. StilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wright v. Globe Porcelain Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Bennett v. BuschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Lansburgh & Bro.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  4. Esler v. Camden & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Bracken v. BruceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API