Pizano v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
The question presented is whether an armed* robber—using his victim as a shield to effect escape—is guilty of murder under an implied malice theory when a third party—unaware of the victim’s presence—accidentally kills the victim while trying to prevent the robber’s escape.
Statements made by this court in People v. Gilbert (1965) 63 Cal.2d 690 [47 Cal.Rptr. 909, 408 P.2d 365] suggest that the robber is not guilty of murder because the third party, not even realizing that the victim is present, is not responding to the robber’s malicious conduct in using the victim as a shield.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. AntickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Dowden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- People v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.