Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Horner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 22, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County. Judge Irving delivered the following opinion in the Court below : The appellant was refused registration as a voter by the appellee, who is Registration Officer of Tangier District, because the appellant in August, 1890, left this State, and took up his abode in Washington City, and did not, when leaving this State, make the affidavit required of him by the Act of 1890, chap. 573. At the hearing in this Court, the appellant…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County. Judge Irving delivered the following opinion in the Court below : The appellant was refused registration as a voter by the appellee, who is Registration Officer of Tangier District, because the appellant in August, 1890, left this State, and took up his abode in Washington City, and did not, when leaving this State, make the affidavit required of him by the Act of 1890, chap. 573. At the hearing in this Court, the appellant testified that he was horn and raised in this county, and never had any other home except a temporary one in Washington…

1Per curiam

The order appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons assigned by the Judge below. The cost of appeal to be paid by the appellant.

Order affirmed.

Robinson, J., dissented.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowling v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API