Legal Opinion
United States v. Winfree
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 1959No. Crim. 19782PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
And now, February 9, 1959, after consideration of evidence produced at the hearing held January 13, 1959, and by stipulation, arguments of counsel, and the attached documents containing au thorities, it is ordered that defendant’s motion for suppression of evidence is denied.
Defendant, Listervelt S. Winfree, was indicted on November 12, 1958, for attempting to evade income taxes for the years 1952 to 1955 in violation of 26 U.S. C.A. § 145(b) (I.R.C.1939) and 26 U.S. C.A. § 7201 (I.R.C.1954). The present matter is before this court on defendant’s motion to suppress…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Benanti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. James L. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Walter P. MacKiewicz and Florence B. MacKiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Ernest Leroy Ivey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.