Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2012PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pigott, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether CPL 430.10 precludes the Appellate Division from remitting a case for resentencing after concluding that the trial court imposed unlawful consecutive sentences on two of the counts. We conclude that it does not.

In the present case involving a particularly vicious attack, defendant was convicted of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]), two counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1], [4]) and robbery in the second degree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. LaSalleNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. YannicelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. The People v. Sergio RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. McClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. CouserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. DaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API