Rothwell v. Singleton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
This is a will contest action wherein it is alleged that a holographic will is void because the testator lacked testamentary capacity and the beneficiary exerted undue influence over the testator. The trial court found that because a prior jury found that the testator had testamentary capacity when she executed a different will, the doctrine of res judicata applied and dismissed the claim. As to the issue of undue influence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the sole beneficiary, E. Eloise Singleton.
The parties to this action have a lengthy history of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Bye v. MattinglyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Gibbs v. WickershamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Burke v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
- Zeiss v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Colorama, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- Hbr Madisonville, LLC v. Lori AtteburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021