Legal Opinion

In re F. M. & S. Q. Carlile

District Court, D. North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of F. M. & S. Q. Carlile. On petition to review a referee’s order setting aside a transfer of certain choses in action made by the bankrupts to the receiver of the Bank of Tarboro.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

The controversy presented by the record relates to the validity of the transfer of certain choses in action made to the receiver of the Bank of Tarboro by the bankrupts within four months prior to the institution of proceedings in bankruptcy, to secure an overdraft due the bank.

[1] Before proceeding to discuss the merits of the case, I deem it proper to call attention to the irregularity in the proceedings had before the referee and the method adopted for bringing the question, raised by his ruling and exceptions thereto, before the court. The trustee seeks to have the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Stayton State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re GaylordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  3. Simpson v. Western Hardware & Metal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re Tomlinson & Dye, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933
  5. In re WalserDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API