Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Eichinger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Deuel county. ITon. A. W. Campbiíul, Judge. Action by the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against J. R. Eichinger and others. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery to- recover possession of certain threshing machinery. The plaintiff is engaged in the manufacture of threshing machines at Racine, Wis., and the defendants are residents of Clear Lake, Deuel county, in this state. On July 29, 1898, the defendants gave a written order to the plaintiff, through its local agent, for the threshing machinery, agreeing to receive the same on arrival, subject to warranty therein, and to pay freight charges thereon, and to pay for the same by turning over to the plaintiff a second hand threshing outfit, and executing and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gaines v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Shull v. New Birdsall Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. H. W. Rogers & Brother v. MarriottNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Willis v. De WittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Connor v. CorsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Webb v. WegleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Deere & Webber Co. v. HinckleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kennedy v. Agricultural InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Koenkamp v. PicassoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kerr v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API