Legal Opinion

Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 4, 1979No. 78-2179, 78-2293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In a diversity action by Curtiss-Wright Corp. (Curtiss) against General Electric Company (GE),' the district court granted summary judgment to Curtiss on its claims for outstanding balances due on contracts with GE; additional claims arising out of the contractual relationship have not yet been adjudicated. The district court certified that the judgments were final under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

GE appealed the 54(b) judgments. It first contends that the entry of the 54(b) certifications was not consistent with a sound exercise of discretion, and…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industries, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API