Legal Opinion

AAR International, Inc. v. Vacances Heliades S.A.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 1, 2004No. 99 C 8090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff AAR International, Inc. (“AAR”) brought this action against defendants Vacances Heliades, S.A., Nimelias Enterprises, S.A., and Princess Airlines, S.A. (collectively, the “defendants”) for breach of an equipment lease dated May 14, 1998 (the “Lease”). The underlying facts are summarized in a memorandum opinion and order I issued on January 28, 2004, in which I ruled on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. 1

The lease in suit is dated May 14, 1998 (the “Lease”). The subject matter of the Lease was a Boeing 737 commercial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grossinger Motorcorp, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Miner v. Fashion Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. H&M Driver Leasing Services, Unlimited, Inc. v. Champion International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Dalston Construction Corp. v. WallaceNew York District Court · 1960
  5. Sharon Leasing, Inc. v. Phil Terese Transportation, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bhole, Inc. v. Shore Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Baird & Warner Residential Sales, Inc. v. RXHST Naperville, LLC f/k/a CAHST Naperville, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API