Legal Opinion

Garland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 2005No. PD-1231-04PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The court of appeals held that appellant’s negotiated plea of nolo contendere was involuntary and that his sentence was illegal. We reverse.

Our discussion begins with a review of the relevant facts. On December 19, 2001, a Bexar County grand jury presented an indictment that charged appellant with two second-degree felonies, to wit: sexual assault (Count I) and indecency with a child (Count II). See Tex. Pen.Code §§ 21.11(a)(1) & 22.011(a)(2)(A). For purposes of punishment enhancement, the indictment also alleged, in three separate paragraphs, that appellant had three prior felony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Ex Parte PrestonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anthony, John Dennis ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Barrera, ReyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Crow, Timmie GeneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Crow, Timmie GeneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Rey Barrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API