Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2013No. SCCQ-11-0000747Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.,

with whom Circuit Judge CHAN, joins.

I reaffirm that because a violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 481B-14 (Supp.2000) 1 which requires that a hotel or restaurant service charge be distributed to employees as tip income or that the contrary be disclosed to consumers, is “deemed” to be an unfair method of competition (also UMOC herein) under HRS § 481B-4 (Supp.2008),2 and thus “unlawful” under HRS § 480-2 (Supp.2002),3 employees as injured “persons” and consumers may sue for damages pursuant to HRS § 480-13 (Supp.2005),4 without alleging…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API