Vass v. State

We affirm Andras Janos Vass’s convictions and sentences for racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, three counts of human trafficking, and one count of deriving support from the proceeds of prostitution. Upon our de novo review, Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 1981), we hold that thei’e was competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdicts, and reject Vass’s argument to the contrary.

We also reject Vass’s contention that trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to renew, at the close of all the evidence, his previous motion…