State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Central Ohio Mutual Relief Ass'n
Ohio Supreme Court
Proceedings in quo warranto. This is a proceeding instituted by the attorney-general on his own relation.' The information states that the defendant is an incorporated company, formed and organized under the act of May 1,1852, and.the acts supplementary thereto, and charges that ever since its organization it has continuously, within this state, to wit, at the county of Champaign, etc., offended against the laws of this state, grossly abused and misused its corporate…
Read the full summary
Proceedings in quo warranto. This is a proceeding instituted by the attorney-general on his own relation.' The information states that the defendant is an incorporated company, formed and organized under the act of May 1,1852, and.the acts supplementary thereto, and charges that ever since its organization it has continuously, within this state, to wit, at the county of Champaign, etc., offended against the laws of this state, grossly abused and misused its corporate authority, franchises, and privileges, and unlawfully assumed and usurped franchises and privileges not granted to it, and…
1Opinion of the CourtGilmore, J.
It has been held by this court that mutual relief associations, incorporated and organized under the act of February 3, 1875, are not subject to the statutes of this state relating to life insurance aud life insurance companies. The State v. The Mutual Protection Association of Ohio, 26 Ohio St. 19.
This does not determine what will constitute a proper incorporation and organization of such associations under the act named; but it is conceded in the information in the •case before us, that the defendant has been incorporated and organized under the act, which must-be taken to be an admission…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Masonic Benevolent Ass'n v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Rockhold v. Canton Masonic Mutual Benevolent SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Massey v. Mutual Relief Society of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- State ex rel. Falke v. Montgomery County Residential Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bates v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.