Legal Opinion · Dissent
Robinson v. Peake
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 27, 2009No. 04-1690Published
1DissentKasold, Judge
The underlying panel opinion in this case addresses an issue of exceptional importance that may impact a significant number of cases that come before the Court, and therefore resolution by the full court is warranted. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(e)(2); cf. Mayfield v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 220, 221-22 (2005) (per curiam order) (Kasold, J., concurring) (concurring in the denial of en banc consideration because the underlying opinion “ ‘resolved’ the exceptionally important issues” presented).
Although I agree with the proposition that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) need only discuss those…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Adway Maggitt, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- James R. Cook, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Norval J. Elkins, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.