Legal Opinion

Cedric Dennard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 2014No. 4D13-3610Published

1DissentWarner, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. The sentences are illegal, as the majority notes. The twenty-two year term can be made legal only by imposing lesser terms and making them consecutive to each other.1

*1058State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003), on which the majority relies, holds that a defendant is not precluded from re-litigating the illegality of a sentence under law of the case or res judicata, but may be barred by collateral estoppel, unless a manifest injustice may occur. In McBride, the court determined that re-litigation of the sentencing claim was barred, because…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Almendares v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Hannah v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API