Legal Opinion

Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. Peter Carlson, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1989No. 88-1804 to 88-1812 and 88-1814PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Overview:

In this consolidated appeal, LeeRoy B. Bostic, Jr., appeals pro se the denial of his petitions for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 2241(e). We find the claims to be without merit and affirm the district court’s dismissals. We discuss them ad seriatim below.

Standard of Review:

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See, e.g., Zimmerlee v. Keeney, 831 F.2d 183, 185 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2851, 101 L.Ed.2d 888 (1987). We also review de novo the district court’s legal conclusion that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Israel Santiago-Lugo v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API