Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bauer

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided September 10, 1963No. 13797BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Stout, J.,

— The basic legal question presented is whether, under Pennsylvania law, the use of the original writ, capias ad respondendum, is proper procedure for collection of municipal taxes, and interest, penalties and fines thereon. The answer, in brief, as to taxes and interest, is no; as to penalties and fines, is yes.

The capias ad respondendum is an original writ of civil arrest. It is a writ of arrest before judgment.1 It originated in early Roman law and has had a history *528of long and varied use in Pennsylvania.2 Its present use is circumscribed by Rule 1481 of Pennsylvania Rules of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Philadelphia v. ClineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Null v. StaigerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Application of ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Commonwealth v. DiefenbacherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API