Legal Opinion

State v. Auger

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 2002No. 2000-673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

This is an interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Hillsborough District Court (Hatfield, J.), see Sup. Ct. R. 9, asking whether a non-criminal violation-level offense can trigger the imposition of a suspended sentence conditioned upon only the defendant’s “good behavior.” We respond in the negative.

‘We accept the statement of the case presented in the interlocutory transfer.” Trovato v. Deveau, 143 N.H. 523, 524 (1999). In November 1999, the defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a controlled drug and one count of resisting arrest. He was sentenced to sixty days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BudgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Trovato v. DeveauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. State v. DerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. State v. PalermoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. Laryssa J. BennerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
  5. William v. State NHDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API