Legal Opinion

Healy v. Hering

New Rochelle City Court

Decided January 11, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtFasso, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the petition herein on two grounds: First, that the tenant should have been served with a thirty-day notice of termination of tenancy instead of a ten-day notice; second, that there is no legal basis for eviction of the tenant on the grounds set forth in the petition.

It is the view of the court that a thirty-day notice should have been given to the tenant, for the Appellate Division, Second Department, has held in two cases (Ellenbogen v. Caldwell, 270 App. Div. 946; Matter of Hollis v. Gelbach, 270 App. Div. 1063) that the Federal Controlled Housing Rent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellenbogen v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Hollis v. GelbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API