Dismukes v. Halpern
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Monroe. Circuit: Court in Chancery. Hon; M. T. Sanders, Circuit Judge. - i. That the prpbate. co,.ur,t had no, jurisdiction to partition lands.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Monroe. Circuit: Court in Chancery. Hon; M. T. Sanders, Circuit Judge. - i. That the prpbate. co,.ur,t had no, jurisdiction to partition lands. Constitution of 1836, art. 6, sec. go; Gould’s Digest, chap. ‡8, sec.. 2; Act of March 16, 1871; Gould’s Digest, chap. 122, sec. 1; Pomeroy’s Equity, sec. 13, et seq.; My rick v. Jacks, 33 Ark., Jpg , . * 2. That the probate court had.,no .jurisdiction to render a money judgment inter partes. . Same authorities, as above, and Phelps., et al-, v,. Buck, et al.,jQ Ark.,, 219, /, 3'. That- the lien ,of a- judgment is limited to three, years.…
1Opinion of the Court
Cockrill, C. J..-.The appellants are the -heirs at law of Charles W. Daniels.' The latter, in his lifetime, joined with the other heirs of W. H. Daniels in a petition to the probate court of Monroe county to partition lands which they had inherited from W. H. Daniels.
-An order for partition was ’ made in the probate . court in 1871, in pursuance of the petition, and commissioners were appo'intéd to set off shares to the several heirs and to allot dower to the widow of W. H. Daniels. .The commissioners reported to the court, designating by metes and boundsThe lands to be allotted to each heir,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
- Jenkins v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- In re BlountDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1906
- Percy v. CockrillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.