Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of Staiano

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel F. Luciano, J.

In this proceeding commenced pursuant to article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law for the appointment of a guardian, the petitioners, Kathleen Staiano and Joel Ulino, seek the appointment of a guardian for the alleged incapacitated person, Josephine D. Staiano.

In the order to show cause pursuant to which this proceeding was commenced, the court appointed Perry S. Reich, Esq., as the Court Evaluator.

Subsequently, the court determined that in order to better serve the interests of the alleged incapacitated person, Josephine D. Staiano, it would be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. In re the Appointment of a Conservator of the Property of NoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Home Savings of America v. GkaniosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Matter of Adler (Garyfalia K.)New York Supreme Court, Nassau County · 2024
  3. Matter of Adler (Garyfalia K.)New York Supreme Court, Nassau County · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API