Legal Opinion · Dissent

Louisville & Interurban R. R. v. Kraft

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 19, 1913Published

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Nunn.

For the Opinion of the Court see 156 Ky., 66.

I am in complete accord with the principles announced in this ease to the effect that every private and public interest demand of railroad employes the imperative duty to observe and conform to all reasonable rules and regulations imposed by the company for the protection of life and property, and that any trainman who *672violates such rules, of which he has knowledge and has undertaken to perform, takes upon himself the personal consequences of his dereliction. If injury results- to him by reason of such violation, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Interurban Railroad v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API