Legal Opinion

Chemical Corn Exchange Bank v. Brous

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

The motion is for summary judgment on a guaranty. It appears that a corporation known as Miss Cane, Inc. was in financial difficulty. It owed several creditors, including this plaintiff to. which it owed $50,000 on a note. *373On July 22, 1955 an extension agreement with the creditors and with defendant Brous was signed. By the terms of this agreement Brous advanced $100,000 to the corporation. All of the creditors designated their claims as “ old debts ” and subordinated them to ‘ ‘ new debts ’ ’ which were obligations thereafter created. Fifty per cent of each of the old debts were to be paid…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. GellesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Soparge v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API