Legal Opinion

Dunseth v. Bank of the United States

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1833PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In chancery; adjourned from Hamilton. The whole case is stated in the opinion of Judge Wood.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Wood

delivered the opinion of the court:

The complainant, widow of Andrew Dunseth, filed her petition in the court of common pleas of Hamilton county, claiming dower in certain lands in the city of Cincinnati.

The lands were alienated by the husband, and finally passed to the Bank of the United States.

The complainant obtained a decree in the court of common pleas, and the defendant appealed.

All the facts necessary to establish the complainant’s right to dower in the lands in question, viz : that they can not be divided without injury; that the complainant can not, therefore, be endowed *in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byars v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Sanders v. McMillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API