McEntire v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

A motion for rehearing has been filed in this case, and on the argument of appellees in support thereof they contend that the court in its former opinion {ante, p. 92) had placed a wrong construction on the act providing for *829a uniform bill of lading. The essentials of that bill are as follows: “The carrier * * * of any of the property herein described shall be liable for any loss thereof or damage thereto, except as hereinafter provided. * * * For loss, damage, or delay caused by fire occurring after forty-eight hours * * * after notice of the arrival of the property at destination * * has…