Legal Opinion
Odie M. Robles v. City of Fort Wayne, Stanley M. Stanford and Pee Tee, Incorporated, Doing Business as Sweet Pete's Tavern
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 12, 1997No. 96-2302PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Odie M. Robles appeals from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to the City of Fort Wayne on his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In that claim, Robles alleges that Fort Wayne police officer Stanley M. Stanford violated his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments while working off duty as a security officer at Sweet Pete’s Tavern in Fort Wayne. According to Robles, the City is liable for Stanford’s actions because it failed to adequately train its police officers for such off-duty security work, and because it had a policy…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Alfredo Miranda v. County of LakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Henry Szabla v. City Of Brooklyn ParkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Edward Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Sornberger v. City Of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Boyce v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.