Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Southwark Metal Manufacturing Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1976No. Appeal, No. 175 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

In view of the fact that we reversed the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) and sustained the employer’s appeal in Monday Shannon v. Southwark Metal Mfg. Co., 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 463, A.2d (1976) and held there that compensation had been improperly awarded to the claimant in the case, we must here refuse the claimant’s appeal and affirm the Board’s refusal of penalties and attorney’s fees. It is clear from a reading of Sections 440 and 435 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,1 77 P.S. §§996 and 991, that an award of penal*463ties and attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shannon v. Southwark Metal Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vovericz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Cairnbrook Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Shannon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Hochman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Yates v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API