Legal Opinion

Mencio v. Rich Furniture Surplus, No. Cv 91 139051 (Mar. 31, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 31, 1998No. CV 91 139051Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On June 3, 1997, the Plaintiffs, Patricia Mencio and Ned CT Page 3342 Mencio, filed a six count revised complaint alleging a cause of action under the Connecticut Product Liability Act, General Statutes 52-572m et seq. (CPLA) and a cause of action under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes 42-110a et seq. (CUTPA) against the Defendants, Ronald Rich d/b/a Furniture Surplus, Olympic Bedding, and Blocksome Co. The Plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries caused by a defective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Fiondella v. Chrysler Motors Corp., No. Cv 95-0469048 S (Mar. 13, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API