Legal Opinion

Lupton v. Chase Nat. Bank

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 27, 1950No. Civ. A. 120-47PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, Chief Judge.

Under Rule 53(e) (2), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., in actions tried without a jury, the trial court must accept the Master’s findings of fact, unless clearly erroneous. This rule was accepted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anderson v. Mount Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 1193, 90 L.Ed. 1515. Mr. Justice Murphy, who -delivered the opinion for the 'court, had this to say with respect to the Master’s findings: “ * * * This was purely a factual issue. The master made his findings in this respect through the weighing of conflicting…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States of America, and v. Larry Kenneth Gonware, Glenn Holmes Bail Bond AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Lebrón v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  3. United States ex rel. T. M. Page Corp. v. HenslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  4. United States v. DinneenDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  5. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API