Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*270OPINION OF THE COURT

Bloom, J.

This somewhat bizarre robbery and burglary arose out of a debt of $150 allegedly owed by Melvin Tisdale to Miguel “Pinky” Colon. It has resulted in four convictions after trial, Colon, John “Blood” Nash, and the two defendants now before us. A fifth defendant, Michael Graham, pleaded guilty. Colon has not perfected his appeal. The conviction of Nash was affirmed by us without opinion (89 AD2d 1064). Leave to appeal was denied (57 NY2d 960, Cooke, Ch J). Graham has not appealed.

The circumstances which led to the crimes are indeed unusual. Melvin and his brother…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. KiddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API