White v. Bingham

I think the court below was right. I can see no evidence whatever to control the agreed fact that, in the fall of 1918, King Upton *840transferred the stocks in question on the books of the corporations to his wife, pursuant to a declared purpose thus to make her a gift of about half of Ms holdings. The gift was complete; the transfer on the books was delivery (Roberts’ Appeal, 85 Pa. 84; Colton v. Williams, 65 Ill. App. 466; Sanders v. Jarvis, 221 Ill. App. 550); and there was other and entirely uncontradieted evidence of physical delivery to Crowell, who was (again on uncontradieted evidence)…