Legal Opinion
Trickett v. Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County, Kan.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1928No. 7757PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding in contempt. It was brought October 3,1924, by the Kaw Valley Drainage District and the City of Kansas City, Kansas, against appellants, who are attorneys at law residing at Kansas City, Kansas, and David Buckland, Samuel Clark and Peter Kramer who constituted the board of county commissioners of Wyandotte County, Kansas. The petition was filed in Equity Cause No. 339-N, pending in the court below, entitled “Kansas City Railways Company, a Missouri corporation, v. The Board of County Cominis*852sioners of Wyandotte County, Kansas, and the Kaw Valley…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Sioux City Terminal Railroad & Warehouse Co. v. Trust Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Brougham v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McCann v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- United States v. BarkerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
- United States v. SchineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1954
- (PC) Powell v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.