Grey v. Greenville & Hudson Railway Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On application for preliminary injunction and motion to strike out supplemental information and bill. Heard on information and bill and affidavits, answer and affidavits, supplemental information and bill and affidavits and answering affidavit. The defendant is a railroad company organized in 1895, under the General Railroad laws.
Read the full summary
On application for preliminary injunction and motion to strike out supplemental information and bill. Heard on information and bill and affidavits, answer and affidavits, supplemental information and bill and affidavits and answering affidavit. The defendant is a railroad company organized in 1895, under the General Railroad laws. Its railroad is located entirely within the limits of the city of Jersey City, in the county of Hudson, is two and sixty-two hundredths miles long, and the beginning and ending points are both points in the railroad of the Lehigh Valley Terminal Company! The route…
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
This hearing together of the motion to dismiss and the application for preliminary injunction is according to the usual practice where a demurrer or plea is interposed. 2 Dan. Ch. Pr. *596. And the motion to strike out the information and bill, which has, under rule 213, the effect of a demurrer, must be first determined. A case on demurrer must be heard and fully determined as to all questions of law involved on the admitted facts, and these questions cannot be reserved for future determination on final hearing, as is sometimes done where important questions of law are raised on an…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- L. 60, America v. Welin Davit BoatNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Kiss v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019