Legal Opinion

Hantz v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1929No. 13,609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, P. J.

Appellants were indicted and convicted of violating the Prohibition Law, §§4 and 24, Acts 1925 p. 144, §§2717, 2740 Burns 1926. The indictment is in three counts: (1) for selling; (2) for possessing intoxicating liquor; and (3) for maintaining a common nuisance. A trial by jury resulted in a conviction of each appellant on each count. The errors assigned are the overruling of a motion for a new trial, and the overruling of a motion in arrest of judgment.

Appellants contend the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that it is contrary to law. The first count charged a sale of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Denson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gasaway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Shuck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Goldstine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Karlen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API