Legal Opinion

Burch v. Burch

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 31, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case 99 — JOINT TENANT, LIEN APPEAL FROM MEADE CIRCUIT COURT. 1. There is no legal or equitable reason why one joint tenant should have a lien upon the land of his co-tenant for rents collected by him. 2. If a lion exist, it must he founded upon the doctrine of equitable liens. But such lion does not exist. There is no authority for it.

Read the full summary

Case 99 — JOINT TENANT, LIEN APPEAL FROM MEADE CIRCUIT COURT. 1. There is no legal or equitable reason why one joint tenant should have a lien upon the land of his co-tenant for rents collected by him. 2. If a lion exist, it must he founded upon the doctrine of equitable liens. But such lion does not exist. There is no authority for it. (Nelson v. Clay, 7 J. J. Mar., 140; Graham v. Graham, (i Mon., 561; Coleman v. Hutchinson, 3 Bibb., 211 ; O’Bannon v. Roberts, 2 Dana, 54.) We maintain that there is no error in the judgment. Although no direct authority can he found upon the question, we…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE LEWIS

DELIVERED TIIE OPINION OF THE COURT.

In 1855 the heirs at law of Leonard Burch, deceased, recovered judgment for a tract of land, containing about 700 acres. And .in 1858 one of the heirs instituted an action against Thomas B. Burch, administrator, and also an heir, for a settlement of the estate and partition of the land between the seven heirs, it being stated in the petition that he had fraudulently conveyed it to •one Carrico, who was made a defendant to the action.

Three other actions for the same purpose were subsequently commenced. But in 1865 they were all consolidated and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Venable v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  2. Alexander v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. HershySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Hale's Heirs v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Omohundro v. ElkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Pistole v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Knecht v. Knecht, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API