Legal Opinion

Baker v. Merchants' Mut. Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Admiralty Appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Pardee, Ü".

There are two questions of fact in this case upon which the parties differ: (1) Was the Orient seaworthy when she left the port of Liverpool on the voyage during which she was insured ? (2) Was she seaworthy when she sailed from Ship island on the voyage during which she was wrecked and lost ? Seaworthy, in the sense used, means in such a condition of strength and soundness as to resist the ordinary action of the sea, wind, and waves during the contemplated voyage. A ship is seaworthy in this sense when her hull, tackle, apparel, and furniture are in such a condition of soundness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. Bullard v. Roger Williams Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1852
  3. Seton v. Delaware Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1808
  4. Van Epps v. WalshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1870
  5. Watson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1811

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MeyerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896
  2. The NinfaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1907
  3. McKern v. Corporation of Royal Exchange AssuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API