Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Stark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1892Published

Appeal from the Pike Circuit Court. — Hón. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1DissentRombatxer, P. J.

(dissenting).— The controlling guide in construing a will is to ascertain the intention of the testator. Turner v. Timberlake, 53 Mo. 371; Gaines v. Fender, 57 Mo. 342; Carr v. Dings, 58 Mo. 400; Smith v. Hutchinson, 61 Mo. 83; Allison v. *380Chaney, 63 Mo. 279. This intention is to be gathered, not from single words ■ or single passages, but from a consideration of the whole instrument, and the general design and scope of it, giving to each part its proper meaning. Russell Eubanks, 84 Mo. 82. The application of these uncontroverted propositions to the instrument before us compels me to dissent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carr v. DingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Russell v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Turner v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Allison v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Smith v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API