Legal Opinion

Commissioners of Highways v. Drainage Commissioners of District No. 2

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. Frank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This was a petition filed by the appellee in the circuit court of Whiteside county to coerce the appellant to build a bridge across one of the drainage ditches of Drainage District No. 2 of Tampico and Hahnaman townships at a point where its ditch crosses one of the highways of the township of Tampico, and, if necessary, to levy a tax to provide a fund for that purpose. An answer and certain pleas were filed, which averred that the drainage ditch sought to be bridged was a natural watercourse which crossed said highway and which had been enlarged by the drainage district, and it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Ender v. DeneenIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kurtz v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People Ex Rel. DeLeuw & Co. v. Village of MidlothianIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People ex rel. Giese v. DillonIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People ex rel. Road District No. 5 v. Cache River Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API