Legal Opinion

Spitcaufsky v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This case has been reassigned to the writer. The plaintiff-respondent was the successful bidder for the construction of a State road project designated as Route SE., Sec. 2, in Platte County, tó be completed on December 1, 1936. After the work had started the defendant-appellant State Highway Commission (hereinafter called the Commission) changed the design for a large culvert. The Commission claimed the change was necessitated by soil conditions revealed by excavation and by respondent’s faulty method of excavating for the culvert as originally designed. The respondent contended his method…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Rice v. Kansas Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Denton Construction Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Parsons Construction Co. v. Missouri Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Home Shopping Club, Inc. v. Roberts Broadcasting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. County of CamdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API