Watkins v. State

The evidence introduced by the state -was sufficient, if believed beyond a reasonable doubt, to prove the corpus delicti under either count of the indictment, and hence the refusal of the .general charge, as requested by defendant, and the overruling of the motion to discharge the defendant were free from error.

As to the refusal of the court- to give, at the request of defendant, the general charge as to the larceny count, a sufficient answer is that the jury, by its verdict, acquitted the defendant of larceny, so that we need not pass upon any question relating solely to count 1 charging…