Legal Opinion

State v. Wallner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1984No. C6-83-1510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Defendant appeals the 65-month executed sentence imposed after a plea of guilty to the unlawful sale of a Schedule II controlled substance. In computing defendant’s criminal history score, the trial court included five felony convictions that were in the process of appeal. Defendant challenged these inclusions and moved the trial court for either a delay in sentencing or a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The trial court denied both motions. We affirm.

On September 23, 1981, Sandra Wallner sold approximately six grams of phencycli-dine (PCP) to an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TheisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. KnoppsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API